The SAVE America Act (S. 1383) would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, plus photo ID at the polls. It passed the House 218-213 on February 11, 2026. In the Senate it cleared a first procedural step but stalled at the 60-vote filibuster, and a June 4 attempt to attach it to a budget bill failed 48-50, with four Republicans crossing over. The principle behind it is neither left nor right: voting is for citizens, and making sure of that is common sense. Tell your senators it's time to finish the job.
Source: Congress.gov, S. 1383 actions; Fox News, June 4, 2026
Where All 100 Stand
Click any senator to send them a pre-written letter.
It opens your email app, or the senator's official contact form. Your two senators carry the most weight, but you can reach any of the 100. Use “Copy the letter” to paste it in.
Find Your Senators
Start here → your two senators carry the most weight.
Add My Name
We'll send you a confirmation email. Only confirmed signatures are counted.
Where it stands
The SAVE America Act (S. 1383) would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in federal elections, and adds photo-ID and voter-roll verification requirements. (It is distinct from the earlier SAVE Act, H.R. 22, which passed the House in 2025.) Congress.gov, S. 1383.
The House passed it 218-213 on February 11, 2026 (the text of H.R. 7296, substituted into S. 1383). Congress.gov, S. 1383 actions.
In the Senate, a motion to proceed passed 51-48 on March 17 (a simple-majority step that began debate, not final passage), but cloture failed 53-47 on March 26, short of the 60 votes needed to beat a filibuster. A later attempt to attach it to a budget bill, the Graham amendment, failed 48-50 on June 4, 2026. Axios; Fox News.
Four Republicans crossed over to vote no on June 4: Collins (ME), Murkowski (AK), McConnell (KY), Tillis (NC), joining all Democrats and independents. Fox News.
Status as of June 18, 2026
How it could still pass
Senator Mike Lee has proposed forcing opponents to physically hold the floor, a talking filibuster. Once they stop, the Senate could end debate and pass the bill at a simple majority (51 votes) rather than 60. Deseret News.
Lee has escalated: if the rules aren't changed to allow that approach, he says “it is time to nuke the filibuster”, end the 60-vote threshold entirely. Deseret News.
The honest obstacle: some Republican supporters of the bill, including Collins and Curtis, back the SAVE Act on the merits but oppose changing the filibuster rules to pass it. (Here, the bill means the SAVE America Act.) KSL; NPR.
Other routes include attaching it to a must-pass bill (as the Graham/Kennedy amendments attempted), or making it a defining issue in the 2026 midterms. Majority Leader Thune has signaled the Senate may not bring it back to the floor this session. NPR.
Why confirming citizenship makes sense
The SAVE Act's core premise: federal law already limits voting to U.S. citizens. The bill adds documentary proof at registration as enforcement, the same kind of documentation required to obtain a passport, serve on a jury, or work legally. H.R. 22 text, Congress.gov.
The argument for it is not partisan: either you believe federal elections should be decided by citizens, or you don't. Senator Cornyn, the bill's champion, reversed his filibuster position on precisely this ground: that this principle matters more than a procedural rule. Cornyn op-ed.
What critics say, and the honest answer
Collins (ME) supports the SAVE Act on the merits but opposes eliminating or bypassing the filibuster, calling it an essential protection for the minority. She voted no on the June 4 amendment. Fox News.
Murkowski (AK) opposes the bill as drafted, citing concerns that documentation requirements would disenfranchise rural Alaskans, particularly Native communities, who lack standard ID documents. NBC News.
McConnell (KY) opposes on federalism grounds: states run elections, and he opposes both this federal mandate and any changes to Senate filibuster rules. NBC News.
Tillis (NC)supports voter ID but called the reconciliation amendment a “show vote” he believed was not Byrd-rule compliant, and voted no on June 4. Fox News.
These are real objections. This site argues that, on balance, the principle of confirming that voters are citizens is worth working through them, and that the Senate should put every senator on the record with a proper floor vote.
Key sources
- H.R. 22, Congress.gov bill page2026-06-18
- H.R. 22, Full text2026-06-18
- H.R. 22, All actions2026-06-18
- Senate rejects another GOP push to revive the SAVE Act, Democracy Docket2026-06-04
- Four Senate Republicans block the SAVE Act, Fox News2026-06-04
- Senate roll call menu, 119th Congress 2nd session, Senate.gov2026-06-04
- Mike Lee on the talking filibuster, Deseret News2026-02-03
- Lee threatens to nuke the filibuster, Deseret News2026-04-25
- Pressure on Thune, the SAVE Act, and the filibuster, NPR2026-04-14
- Lee's bill hits snags, KSL2026-04-25
- Collins backs SAVE Act, won't scrap filibuster, Fox News2026-04-14
- Republicans warn SAVE Act may fail, NBC News2026-03-14
- Tillis vows to stop the show vote, Fox News2026-06-04
- Curtis firm no on ending the filibuster, The Hill2026-04-14
- Cornyn op-ed: why the SAVE Act matters more than the filibuster2026-03-14